A vindication of the Oath of allegiance : in ansvver to a paper disperst by Mr Sam: Eaton, pretending to prove the Oath of allegiance voyd, and non-obliging. Wherein his positions against it are examined and confuted. / By the author of the Exercitation concerning usurped powers.
The author of the Exercitation = Edward Gee (Halkett & Laing, 2nd ed.). Attributed to Richard Hollinworth (i.e. Hollingworth, the elder) in the Thomason Catalogue.
A reply to: Eaton, Samuel. The Oath of allegiance and the national Covenant proved to be non-obliging.
Annotation on Thomason copy: "Feb: 14 1649"; the imprint date has been crossed out.
Reproduction of the original in the British Library.
Click on the terms below to find similar items in the catalogue
The author of the Exercitation = Edward Gee (Halkett & Laing, 2nd ed.). Attributed to Richard Hollinworth (i.e. Hollingworth, the elder) in the Thomason Catalogue.
A reply to: Eaton, Samuel. The Oath of allegiance and the national Covenant proved to be non-obliging.
Annotation on Thomason copy: "Feb: 14 1649"; the imprint date has been crossed out.
Reproduction of the original in the British Library.
The author of the Exercitation = Edward Gee (Halkett & Laing, 2nd ed.). Attributed to Richard Hollinworth (i.e. Hollingworth, the elder) in the Thomason Catalogue.
A reply to: Eaton, Samuel. The Oath of allegiance and the national Covenant proved to be non-obliging.
Annotation on Thomason copy: "Feb: 14 1649"; the imprint date has been crossed out.
Reproduction of the original in the British Library.
